Bodhraj vs state of j&k case summary

Author: agsl

August undefined, 2024

WebBodh Raj @ Bodha And Ors vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir on 3 September, 2002. Bench: Ruma Pal, Arijit Pasayat. CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 921 of … WebRecoveries of various weapons used by the assailants were made pursuant to the disclosures made by the accused Bodhraj, Bhupinder, Subash Kumar, Rajesh Kumar …

State Of W.B And Another v. Mohd. Khalid And Others

Web"As already mentioned, death may occur within 24 to 48 hours, but usually the first week is the most fatal. In supportive cases, death may occur after five or six weeks or even longer." 17. In Om Prakash vs. State of Punjab, the victim was set ablaze on 17.3.1979 and she sustained burns with which she died only 13 days thereafter. The ... WebJun 24, 2024 · Title of case : Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir. Citation : AIR 1986 SC 494. Court : Supreme Court of India. Bench : O. Chinnappa Reddy and V. … May 31 Case Analysis: Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of … Now you can easily post your announcements or articles on Lawlex … camelija osiguranje sarajevo

Bodh Raj v/s State of Jammu & Kashmir - LawyerServices

WebDiscussion on following cases 1. Bodhraj v. State of J. & K. (2002) 8 SCC 45 2. Sudhakar v. State of Maharashtra (2000) 6 SCC 671 3. Patel Hiralal Joitaram v. State of Gujrat... WebJan 27, 2010 · Cases:- Bhuboni Sahu v. The King, AIR 1949 PC 257 158; Haroon Haji Abdulla v. State of Maharastra, AIR 1975 SC 856 163; ... 12 Bodhraj v. State of J. & K. (2002) 8 SCC 45 76 13. Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 22 86 14. Sudhakar v. State of Maharashtra (2000) 6 SCC 671 95 15. Patel Hiralal Joitaram v. State of … WebThis appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 25.7.2014 of the High Court of Chhatisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No.470 of 2001. The appellant Rambraksh @ Jalim was accused No.2 and Bechan Ram was accused No.1 in the case in Sessions Trial No.133 of 1993, on the file of Additional Sessions Judge, Surajpur, and they were tried … camelija osiguranje banja luka

Patel Hiralal Joitaram vs State Of Gujarat on 18 October, 2001

Sudhakar and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra – Court Verdict

WebSep 3, 2002 · In Bhagat Ram v. State of Punjab, it was laid down that where the case depends upon the conclusion drawn from circumstances the cumulative effect of the … WebOct 11, 2024 · The Supreme Court of India’s decision, in the case of, Dr. Sunil Clifford Daniel v. the State of Punjab (2012) concerned about the inter-relation existing between Section 162 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Section 162 (1) reads as, “a statement made by any person to a … camelija osiguranje tuzlaWebOrissa High Court, Cuttack camelija osiguranje brčko

"WebJul 17, 2000 · 2. Najjam Faraghi @ Nijjam Faruqui v. State of West Bengal (JT 1997 (9) SC 118) 3. Ratan Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (JT 1996 (11) SC 218) 4. Fazal Ali, J. in Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra (1984 (4) SCC 116) 5. Manohar Lal v. State of Punjab (1981 Crl.LJ 1373 (P&H)) 6. Ratan Gond v. State of Bihar (1959 SCR … " - Bodhraj vs state of j&k case summary

Bodhraj vs state of j&k case summary

WebJUDGMENT. ORIGINAL PDF. Badri Rai & Another v. State Of Bihar . Sinha, J.—. This appeal by special leave, is directed against the concurrent judgments and orders of the courts below, convicting the two appellants under Section 120-B read with Section 165-A of the Indian Penal Code, and sentencing them to rigorous imprisonment for 18 months ... WebNov 24, 1994 · 37. It is the duty of the sanctioning authority to apply its mind. In Indu Bhusan Chatterjee v. State AIR 1955 Cal 430 it has been so laid down. The order according sanction must give reasons. The necessity for giving reasons has been laid down in Uma Charan v. State of M.P 1981 4 SCC 102, 105 and again in Siemens Engg. & Mfg.

Did you know?

WebDec 4, 2012 · Reliance in this regard was placed on Ranbir and Ors. v. State of Punjab, (1973) 2 SCC 444 and Bodhraj v. State of J & K, (2002) 8 SCC 45. 30. ... In this case, the telephonic information is rather cryptic and was recorded in the General Diary as follows: “Today in the marginally noted time I received an information over Telephone from an ... WebApr 14, 2024 · Pragash Boopal. -. April 14, 2024. In the Supreme Court of India Original Civil Jurisdiction Case No. 1955 AIR 781, 1955 SCR (2) 589 Petitioners Bhikaji Narain …

WebMar 5, 2008 · State of U.P. and others, (1973) 3 SCC 6.... 5. Contusion 10 cm x 3.5 cm. over the left side of neck just below the left ear. 6. Contusion 18 cm. x 7 cm over the left upper back extending up to left upper arm... State Of U.P v. Raj Narain And Others. 2. Court: Supreme Court Of India. WebSep 14, 2024 · Bodh Raj vs State Of J&K; And Others on 13 September, 2024. Section 467 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973. ... Even the Apex Court has held that mensrea on the part of the accused is must to establish to make out the case of cheating as held in 2003 JKJ (1) SC. 6. In the present case, the complainant was regularly …

WebMar 29, 2024 · In the case of Bodh Raj v. State of Jammu & Kashmir, [vi] the Court held that that for a conviction to be solely based on circumstantial evidence following … WebJul 16, 2024 · In Bhagat Ram v. State of Punjab [AIR 1954 SC 621], it was laid down that where the case depends upon the conclusion drawn from circumstances the cumulative …

WebJul 21, 2024 · In the case of Bodh Raj V State of Jammu & Kashmir, AIR 2002 SC 316the Supreme Co...argument advanced by the defence counsel that no independent witness …

WebThe notes and questions for Sudhakar v. State of Maharashtra [2000 SC] have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Sudhakar v. State of Maharashtra [2000 SC] covers topics like and Sudhakar v. State of Maharashtra [2000 SC] Example, for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings ... camelija osiguranje bihaćWebSep 3, 2002 · Judgment Text. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. (1) These four appeals relate to a Division Bench judgment of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court dated 31-7-2000. While Criminal Appeal Nos. 921/2000, 791/2001, 792/2001 have been filed by the accused, Criminal Appeal No. 837/2001 has been filed by the State. came like a stormWebJul 21, 2024 · Batya v.State of Rajasthan (Supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court discussed the scope and purpose of the examination of the accused person u/s 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 a...Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda v.State of Maharashtra (Supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a Three Judge Bench decision discussed the law in general … camelina \u0026 strobeWebPETITIONER: HARI CHARAN KURMI AND JOGIA HAJAM Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF BIHAR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/02/1964 BENCH: SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.(CJ) BENCH: SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.(CJ) WANCHOO, K.N. GUPTA, K.C. DAS SHAH, J.C. AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA CITATION: 1964 AIR 1184 1964 SCR (6) 623 CITATOR … camelina zapatosWebState of J. & K. [2002 SC] Bodhraj v. State of J. & K. [2002 SC] Before analysing factual aspects it may be stated that for a crime to be proved it is not necessary that the crime must be seen to have been committed and must, in all circumstances be proved by direct ocular evidence by examining before the court those persons who had seen its ... cameli \u0026 hoag pc camelinaöljy prismaWebJul 15, 2014 · I.R.Coelho V. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 2007, SC 861 By Swati Ghildiyal,CLC, Faculty of Law, DU. Introduction: Justice Mathew, in Indira Gandhi case[i] had perceptively stated “The concept of basic structure as a brooding omnipresence in the sky apart from specific provisions of the constitution is too vague and indefinite to provide a … camel jamie jeans